Great conversation to listen to. Very insightful by two industry leaders. Some people are master human readers, because they learn the characteristics of human nature. I feel like the challenges we pose, like emotions, is simply more about how do we learn how to capture and train, vs. it really being a far reach away. When Pixar makes a scene and they know it will land well and create an emotional response, it's simply because those creating it have been trained from life and the learnings of given cause and effect of a given emotion. So if how we act and think starts from the factor of how/what we learn, would it be fair to say a lot of this will be trained in AI. AI won't have emotions, but it will mimic it well and be able to creatively figure out it. Even in the example you shared about creativity depleting with AI in the group, wouldn't the LLM change in its depth of creativity if it was trained on prompted differently? Would it be more fair to say the lack of creativity more was the result of lack of creative prompting?
In Ep 5.Mr.Kartik,the famous AI Expert and Mr.David Droga,CEO of Accenture’s creative agency Song touch upon many themes centered around the future of human creativity. Mr.Kartik’s own research set in the context of creative writing discovers the truth that even when AI improves writing quality and efficiency, it reduces the aggregate diversity of ideas.The article is full of wisdom on what it takes the creative process to thrive in ai’s biggest opportunity and watch outs. The themes and discussions are “taste gets industrialized” are eye openers.Sometimes sameness trims away the smell of pine and the crunch underfoot.I learned a lot about humans’ vs AI’s creative processes.
Great conversation to listen to. Very insightful by two industry leaders. Some people are master human readers, because they learn the characteristics of human nature. I feel like the challenges we pose, like emotions, is simply more about how do we learn how to capture and train, vs. it really being a far reach away. When Pixar makes a scene and they know it will land well and create an emotional response, it's simply because those creating it have been trained from life and the learnings of given cause and effect of a given emotion. So if how we act and think starts from the factor of how/what we learn, would it be fair to say a lot of this will be trained in AI. AI won't have emotions, but it will mimic it well and be able to creatively figure out it. Even in the example you shared about creativity depleting with AI in the group, wouldn't the LLM change in its depth of creativity if it was trained on prompted differently? Would it be more fair to say the lack of creativity more was the result of lack of creative prompting?
This is yet another good conversation, Kartik.
Apart from the imported and well-presented content, the recording is of high quality. Clear picture and voice.
Your summaries at the end are a nice way of recalling the session. Most podcasts abruptly end with a message to the viewers, without summarising.
In Ep 5.Mr.Kartik,the famous AI Expert and Mr.David Droga,CEO of Accenture’s creative agency Song touch upon many themes centered around the future of human creativity. Mr.Kartik’s own research set in the context of creative writing discovers the truth that even when AI improves writing quality and efficiency, it reduces the aggregate diversity of ideas.The article is full of wisdom on what it takes the creative process to thrive in ai’s biggest opportunity and watch outs. The themes and discussions are “taste gets industrialized” are eye openers.Sometimes sameness trims away the smell of pine and the crunch underfoot.I learned a lot about humans’ vs AI’s creative processes.